This experience left me to wonder: Why would a so-called millennial student choose paper over a computer?
Below are my theories based on casual conversations with students and my observations during the exams:
- Students like to hold the exam in their hands to gauge the length of the test and to have indicators of space to determine the length of individual answers.
- Students like to flip through their exam to check their answers. Some students flip through 3 or 4 times before handing in the exam. While they can do this on the computer, it somehow doesn't "feel" the same to them.
- Students don't like the countdown timer ticking away the minutes. Even with a clock in the room where they take the paper exam, they don't feel as intimidated as they do looking at a digital clock telling them how much time is left.
- Students don't trust the technology. My guess is that this is the biggest barrier. They are afraid that they system will "crash" and they will lose their work and have to start over.
3 comments:
Hey Professor,
I have to think that the first two options are more important than the last two.
I think students are just in favor of what they're used to. I'm 2 years out of college and I never took an exam on a computer in school. It was never offered.
So it's fairly new and it's to be expected that most people will pick the more familiar medium.
That's interesting - we've had students offered both PC & paper to write the answers for an essay type exam (not all subjects ; just one that we tried it in). The vast majority (over several years) have selected the computer.
The lecturers also prefer it - less handwriting to struggle to read!
Our PhD program goes back and forth on whether students can/must use computers when writing their comprehensives. Since finance/econ students in particular draw graphs, it's almost always both.
Post a Comment